First Drive Review
arrow
99 problems but the stitch ain’t one. (Okay, so maybe not as many problems as that.)
England can feel like the land that time forgot. The quaint villages dotting the countryside are just short Sunday strolls apart, the roads connecting them no wider or smoother than necessary for horse-drawn carts. Ask a woman her weight, and she’ll give it to you in stone before slapping you. Perhaps it’s no surprise, then, that Aston Martin can sometimes seem like the car company that time forgot. Replacing the DBS for 2013 as Aston’s sportiest, most expensive offering, the Vanquish wears styling that is directly, obviously traceable to the 1994 DB7. Behind the familiar face rests a 5.9-liter V-12 that debuted in 2000 and a central architecture dating to the 2004 DB9.
This is not to suggest, however, that Aston is sitting completely still. While the aluminum structure remains largely the same as the DBS’s (and DB9’s, and Vantage’s, and Rapide’s), the front-end structure is significantly lighter and is redesigned to allow the engine to mount 0.7 inch lower than in the DBS. Every body panel is new and now made of carbon fiber, contributing to a 25-percent increase in torsional rigidity and a weight reduction of around 150 pounds, according to the manufacturer. Still, figure on a curb weight of about 3850 pounds. Updating the big V-12 with variable timing on both intake and exhaust cams (now hollow), larger throttle bodies, a revised intake manifold, and a few other tweaks bumps output from the DBS’s 510 horsepower and 420 pound-feet of torque to 565 and 457, respectively.
Aston Martin still describes the Vanquish as a grand tourer, but a sporty grand tourer—the more laid-back being the DB9. The ride is quite firm, tending more toward sports-car stiff than GT supple. On smooth roads, the unyielding suspension contributes to surprising nimbleness and neutrality. Over rough tarmac, the Vanquish maintains its composure even in fast, lumpy corners, only—but readily—getting squirrelly with a mid-corner throttle kick. While the dampers offer three settings—normal, sport, and track—even in normal there’s hardly more body roll than there would be if the axles bolted directly to the subframes. And “track” is a rare bit of truth in advertising; nobody will ever want to use it anywhere else.
Hydraulic steering assist survives in the Vanquish. It’s a nice reminder of the way things still are in fewer and fewer cars. Quick, with a sporting but restrained weight that builds nicely in proportion to cornering forces, the rack allows appropriate feedback for something that its maker is unwilling to call a sports car, but the line goes a bit fuzzy at the limit. We do dig the available squared-off steering wheel, borrowed from the limited-edition One-77.
When compared with other V-12 sports cars in its pricing stratosphere, the DBS always seemed underpowered. Now, with 565 horses, the Vanquish . . . still seems underpowered. The Lamborghini Aventador has 691 horsepower. The Ferrari F12’s 730 beats Aston’s output by 165 horses. At least Aston’s flagship is no longer out-muscled by BMW’s SUVs. Nonetheless, we estimate it should hit 60 mph in 4.0 seconds, which, if well off the pace of today’s hottest smartphone wallpapers, does minimize the risk of being embarrassed by Mustangs and Camaros. And Aston’s V-12 is a thing of aural beauty; a sharp bark on startup and a guttural swell to redline can almost make you forget that Ferrari’s V-12 GT has 29 percent more power. Almost. Twenty-nine percent is a lot.
Specifications
VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2- or 2+2-passenger, 2-door coupe
BASE PRICE: $282,110
ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 48-valve V-12, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement: 362 cu in, 5935 cc
Power: 565 hp @ 6750 rpm
Torque: 457 lb-ft @ 5500 rpm
TRANSMISSION: 6-speed automatic with manual shifting mode
DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 107.9 in
Length: 185.8 in
Width: 75.3 in Height: 50.9 in
Curb weight: 3850 lb
PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 4.0 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.4 sec
¼-mile: 12.4 sec
Top speed: 183 mph
PROJECTED FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST):
EPA city/highway: 13/20 mpg
Continued…